<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Macworld iTablet: Ramblings of a Madman, or does he know something&#8230;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/</link>
	<description>Mac news and rumors dug up on the web and sewn into and unholy monster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timstigator</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-149087</link>
		<dc:creator>Timstigator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-149087</guid>
		<description>Doug: thanks for letting me know how much you make. NOW GO SET UP YOUR &#039;THON NETWORK. Geeeez. Get off your soapbox and get to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug: thanks for letting me know how much you make. NOW GO SET UP YOUR &#8216;THON NETWORK. Geeeez. Get off your soapbox and get to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabid Doug</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-104187</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabid Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-104187</guid>
		<description>Ethan,

Glad you did read the links, I just like yanking people&#039;s chains. I respect what you have to say.

But 2 years?? Remember, the iPhone shows the technology exists and can be mass-produced.

And to TIMSTIGATOR:I&#039;m 38 years old and own a small business and made over $100,000 last year and if this tablet doesn&#039;t make the light of day soon I WILL EAT MY OWN HAT!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan,</p>
<p>Glad you did read the links, I just like yanking people&#8217;s chains. I respect what you have to say.</p>
<p>But 2 years?? Remember, the iPhone shows the technology exists and can be mass-produced.</p>
<p>And to TIMSTIGATOR:I&#8217;m 38 years old and own a small business and made over $100,000 last year and if this tablet doesn&#8217;t make the light of day soon I WILL EAT MY OWN HAT!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-104107</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-104107</guid>
		<description>I did read the article, and I&#039;m familiar with the patent application for the 8cm disk adapter. That doesn&#039;t even begin to imply that Apple would sell a device that only accepts 8cm optical disks, even if it is just a dock. They simply want to be able to send smaller software boxes.

I agree that the whole thing fits together very well. That doesn&#039;t mean it is an upcoming product as you describe it. If you happen to have read my previous comments on this site about multi-touch from Apple you will see that I have thought a lot about the future of the interface*, so no I don&#039;t think iPods and iPhones are as far as Apple with take multi-touch.

Here&#039;s where I stand in general on this: You&#039;re right. Apple will release a tablet or primarily multi-touch platform, probably within the next 2 years. The device as you describe it, however, is just not that platform.

I can&#039;t discredit specific claims that you are making. I think many things you describe about the tablet will prove true of it (runs Windows, etc.), but as a whole your description just doesn&#039;t sit well in my mind. Yes, this is only my opinion, especially since I can&#039;t give much reason for it.

*I don&#039;t expect that you&#039;ve read every comment, as I haven&#039;t, but just in the event that you had read my comments on the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the article, and I&#8217;m familiar with the patent application for the 8cm disk adapter. That doesn&#8217;t even begin to imply that Apple would sell a device that only accepts 8cm optical disks, even if it is just a dock. They simply want to be able to send smaller software boxes.</p>
<p>I agree that the whole thing fits together very well. That doesn&#8217;t mean it is an upcoming product as you describe it. If you happen to have read my previous comments on this site about multi-touch from Apple you will see that I have thought a lot about the future of the interface*, so no I don&#8217;t think iPods and iPhones are as far as Apple with take multi-touch.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where I stand in general on this: You&#8217;re right. Apple will release a tablet or primarily multi-touch platform, probably within the next 2 years. The device as you describe it, however, is just not that platform.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t discredit specific claims that you are making. I think many things you describe about the tablet will prove true of it (runs Windows, etc.), but as a whole your description just doesn&#8217;t sit well in my mind. Yes, this is only my opinion, especially since I can&#8217;t give much reason for it.</p>
<p>*I don&#8217;t expect that you&#8217;ve read every comment, as I haven&#8217;t, but just in the event that you had read my comments on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIMSTIGATOR</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-104066</link>
		<dc:creator>TIMSTIGATOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 03:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-104066</guid>
		<description>DOUG: nice conspiracy thinking. GET BACK TO YOUR OFFICE AND DO SOME WORK, MAKE SOME MONEY AND HELP DRIVE THE ECONOMY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOUG: nice conspiracy thinking. GET BACK TO YOUR OFFICE AND DO SOME WORK, MAKE SOME MONEY AND HELP DRIVE THE ECONOMY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabid Doug</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103728</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabid Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103728</guid>
		<description>Ethan,

Ethan, Ethan, Ethan.

READ THE LINKS I INCLUDED!!!!! Especially the one about the 8 cm optical drive, its a done deal.

This isn&#039;t possible or well thought out?????!!!!!!! Dude, have you heard of the iPhone???? This, from an engineering standpoint, is nothing but a larger iPhone, without the actual cellular phone components, and therefore much simpler to make a reality.

And regarding Richard&#039;s thoughts on 32GB or 64GB of NAND flash storage being unlikely, you realize 32GB versions are already available, right? And you can combine them internally, so a 64GB could be even four 16GB ones - these things are TEENY, check these links:

http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/s...a-bit-of-skin/

http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/s...heaper-faster/

And them re-read the link I posted about Apple procurring long-term contracts for NAND from Samsung. 

DO YOU EALLY THINK THE IPHONE AND IPOD TOUCH ARE AS FAR AS APPLE IS TAKING THE TOUCHSCREEN, LEOPARD &quot;LITE&quot;, AND NAND STORAGE DEVICES???? 

Wake up, any moron should see this device coming from miles away.

And the dock uses nothing but existing, off-the-shelf components. Joe Blow Technology Company Inc. could manufacture it tomorrow if they wanted.

I am largely speculating on price, I admit. Also exact software specs. 

I think my later paragraphs are as erudite and well-composed as the early ones, but it was getting late when I wrote it.

As far as battery life: whatever, not worth arguing about at this point.

Keep the comments comin&#039;! I love debunking them! In time, YOU ALL WILL EAT YOUR WORDS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan,</p>
<p>Ethan, Ethan, Ethan.</p>
<p>READ THE LINKS I INCLUDED!!!!! Especially the one about the 8 cm optical drive, its a done deal.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t possible or well thought out?????!!!!!!! Dude, have you heard of the iPhone???? This, from an engineering standpoint, is nothing but a larger iPhone, without the actual cellular phone components, and therefore much simpler to make a reality.</p>
<p>And regarding Richard&#8217;s thoughts on 32GB or 64GB of NAND flash storage being unlikely, you realize 32GB versions are already available, right? And you can combine them internally, so a 64GB could be even four 16GB ones &#8211; these things are TEENY, check these links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/s...a-bit-of-skin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/23/s&#8230;a-bit-of-skin/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/s...heaper-faster/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/03/s&#8230;heaper-faster/</a></p>
<p>And them re-read the link I posted about Apple procurring long-term contracts for NAND from Samsung. </p>
<p>DO YOU EALLY THINK THE IPHONE AND IPOD TOUCH ARE AS FAR AS APPLE IS TAKING THE TOUCHSCREEN, LEOPARD &#8220;LITE&#8221;, AND NAND STORAGE DEVICES???? </p>
<p>Wake up, any moron should see this device coming from miles away.</p>
<p>And the dock uses nothing but existing, off-the-shelf components. Joe Blow Technology Company Inc. could manufacture it tomorrow if they wanted.</p>
<p>I am largely speculating on price, I admit. Also exact software specs. </p>
<p>I think my later paragraphs are as erudite and well-composed as the early ones, but it was getting late when I wrote it.</p>
<p>As far as battery life: whatever, not worth arguing about at this point.</p>
<p>Keep the comments comin&#8217;! I love debunking them! In time, YOU ALL WILL EAT YOUR WORDS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103639</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a little more than bull, but, sorry Doug, I gotta say its not 100%. Its not 80% there either.

Things start to fall apart around the last 5 paragraphs of email 1. Its obvious Doug&#039;s ideas aren&#039;t very well thought out in those paragraphs and it looks as if he is thinking of new stuff as he writes.

Worse is the idea that Apple would put an 8cm optical drive rather than a standard size drice in the dock. Doug, Doug, Doug! There&#039;s nothing to even say about that. That&#039;s insane.

On battery life: Even if Apple does usually under-promise on battery life you wouldn&#039;t expect Apple&#039;s promised 5-8 hour battery life to be real-life 8-12 hour - Apple doesn&#039;t under-promise that much. Doug does imply that this is speculation, but I would speculate 6-10 hours if apple said 5-8.

All in all I believe Doug has some inside information, but he should not try to make his claims more believable with extra speculation. Just give the info as you get it Doug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a little more than bull, but, sorry Doug, I gotta say its not 100%. Its not 80% there either.</p>
<p>Things start to fall apart around the last 5 paragraphs of email 1. Its obvious Doug&#8217;s ideas aren&#8217;t very well thought out in those paragraphs and it looks as if he is thinking of new stuff as he writes.</p>
<p>Worse is the idea that Apple would put an 8cm optical drive rather than a standard size drice in the dock. Doug, Doug, Doug! There&#8217;s nothing to even say about that. That&#8217;s insane.</p>
<p>On battery life: Even if Apple does usually under-promise on battery life you wouldn&#8217;t expect Apple&#8217;s promised 5-8 hour battery life to be real-life 8-12 hour &#8211; Apple doesn&#8217;t under-promise that much. Doug does imply that this is speculation, but I would speculate 6-10 hours if apple said 5-8.</p>
<p>All in all I believe Doug has some inside information, but he should not try to make his claims more believable with extra speculation. Just give the info as you get it Doug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103542</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103542</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the 7 inch screen. Make it 9 or 10 and i&#039;m sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the 7 inch screen. Make it 9 or 10 and i&#8217;m sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabid Doug</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103521</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabid Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103521</guid>
		<description>Another doubting Thomas said the whole syncing-with-user-accounts-on-another-hard-drive thingy was impossible. Let&#039;s first of all give him a big &quot;DUH!!!&quot;. Logging in to a user account stored on a server over a network has long been a basic feature of Unix systems. But does anyone remember the briefly publicized &quot;Home on iPod&quot; feature of Panther that never materialized? Let me point you to a couple articles for a refresher:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/06/10/11/apples_missing_home_on_ipod_feature_resurfaces_in_filing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link 1&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/news.php?id=253&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link 2&lt;/a&gt;

The first link is especially enlightening. The feature was deemed to be not-ready-for-prime-time at that point, and then Jobs decided it was distracting and off-focus for a consumer entertainment device, and it also solved one of the equations for a successful tablet/enterprise device, so was tucked in his back pocket until the rest of the pieces for the tablet Mac came into place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another doubting Thomas said the whole syncing-with-user-accounts-on-another-hard-drive thingy was impossible. Let&#8217;s first of all give him a big &#8220;DUH!!!&#8221;. Logging in to a user account stored on a server over a network has long been a basic feature of Unix systems. But does anyone remember the briefly publicized &#8220;Home on iPod&#8221; feature of Panther that never materialized? Let me point you to a couple articles for a refresher:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/06/10/11/apples_missing_home_on_ipod_feature_resurfaces_in_filing.html" rel="nofollow">link 1</a><br />
<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/news.php?id=253" rel="nofollow">link 2</a></p>
<p>The first link is especially enlightening. The feature was deemed to be not-ready-for-prime-time at that point, and then Jobs decided it was distracting and off-focus for a consumer entertainment device, and it also solved one of the equations for a successful tablet/enterprise device, so was tucked in his back pocket until the rest of the pieces for the tablet Mac came into place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabid Doug</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103515</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabid Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103515</guid>
		<description>Nope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm Potter</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2007/11/the-macworld-itablet-ramblings-of-a-madman-or-does-he-know-something/comment-page-1/#comment-103479</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/archives/952#comment-103479</guid>
		<description>A dock like this?

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2884727</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A dock like this?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2884727" rel="nofollow">http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2884727</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

