<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Apple gunning for Exchange Server with the new iCal beta?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macenstein.com/default/2010/07/is-apple-gunning-for-exchange-server-with-the-new-ical-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2010/07/is-apple-gunning-for-exchange-server-with-the-new-ical-beta/</link>
	<description>Mac news and rumors dug up on the web and sewn into and unholy monster</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: imajoebob</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2010/07/is-apple-gunning-for-exchange-server-with-the-new-ical-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-201218</link>
		<dc:creator>imajoebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/?p=8769#comment-201218</guid>
		<description>Well, it took about 4 years for Exchange to behave well with Macs, and that was all done by Apple, no MS (who ever got Entourage to work as a reliable client?).  But this isn&#039;t about Apple working with Exchange, it&#039;s about everybody to work WITHOUT Exchange.

I&#039;m pretty sure Apple doesn&#039;t want to handle email systems for Ford or GE (yet), but they do want to start picking off all the small shops they can with a plug-and-play alternative to Exchange or to paying someone else to manage you on their Exchange server.  Getting CalDAV as standard is a big step, and getting it on those giant Exchange servers is a huge leap.

I wonder if Apple would add a &#039;light weight&quot; email section to their Apple Server, enabling you to set up your own home email.  Then you just pay 5 bucks a year for an IP address - or maybe even through MobileMe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it took about 4 years for Exchange to behave well with Macs, and that was all done by Apple, no MS (who ever got Entourage to work as a reliable client?).  But this isn&#8217;t about Apple working with Exchange, it&#8217;s about everybody to work WITHOUT Exchange.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Apple doesn&#8217;t want to handle email systems for Ford or GE (yet), but they do want to start picking off all the small shops they can with a plug-and-play alternative to Exchange or to paying someone else to manage you on their Exchange server.  Getting CalDAV as standard is a big step, and getting it on those giant Exchange servers is a huge leap.</p>
<p>I wonder if Apple would add a &#8216;light weight&#8221; email section to their Apple Server, enabling you to set up your own home email.  Then you just pay 5 bucks a year for an IP address &#8211; or maybe even through MobileMe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://macenstein.com/default/2010/07/is-apple-gunning-for-exchange-server-with-the-new-ical-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-201178</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macenstein.com/default/?p=8769#comment-201178</guid>
		<description>Um, iCal already works just fine with Exchange 2007. My iCal calendar is chock full of Exchange goodness/badness. And the same is true for iOS devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, iCal already works just fine with Exchange 2007. My iCal calendar is chock full of Exchange goodness/badness. And the same is true for iOS devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

