WTF? - “BRICKED_AND_SIM_LOCKED_STRING” found in iPhone v2.0 firmware

April 11, 2008 by Dr. Macenstein
Filed under: Hacks, Opinion, WTF, iPhone 


The Greek technology site iPhone Hellas has been poking around in the iPhone 2 beta firmware and found all sorts of GPS-related goodies, as well as some more YouTube and Google integration, but the really interesting thing (to me anyway) is that they have also found the following string buried deep in the code: “BRICKED_AND_SIM_LOCKED_STRING”.

WTF?

OK, I understand Apple feeling the need to play the cat and mouse game with iPhone hackers in trying to keep the iPhone secure and such, but for Apple to openly put a string in their code that flaunts their “bricking” an iPhone if the SIM is unlocked is pretty lame. And to tell you the truth, it can only make Apple look bad, not just to consumers, but to the media. It’s one thing for Cnet to inevitably report “The iPhone v2 software has been once again unlocked,” but it is another for the headline to read “Despite Apple’s best efforts, the iPhone v2 software has been once again unlocked“.

Of course, there’s a chance this is just a boolean flag to tell if the iPhone is already bricked, as faithful Macenstein reader jester points out, but even so, who decides if an iPhone is bricked? Short of an electrical hit, it is Apple who decides if an iPhone is bricked via software hacking.

So far Apple’s position to iPhone unlocking in the media has been one of “we don’t encourage it”. Now it looks like they may be changing their position to “we won’t let it happen”, which is more likely than not, impossible. My advice? Apple should just rename that string something like “Wookalar”, and if hackers can’t beat it, Apple looks good, but when they do defeat it, Apple won’t look like they tried really hard to keep them out and failed. This just seems like a bad move as the iPhone makes a push into the security skittish enterprise market.

Thanks to faithful Macenstein reader Art Vandalay for the tip.

[via ZDNet]

Every time you submit our site, an Angel gets its wings.
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Fark
  • Spurl

Comments

9 Comments on WTF? - “BRICKED_AND_SIM_LOCKED_STRING” found in iPhone v2.0 firmware

  1. Lewis on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 12:27 pm
  2. To be honest, it’s probably nothing to do with jailbreaking/unlocking. A lot of modern phones have the ability to be “bricked” - so that if they’re stolen, as long as it’s reported quickly enough and the phone is on with the original sim, it can be “bricked” for security.

  3. James on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 12:35 pm
  4. Well, at least we now know what the next Slashdot story on the iPhone will be.

  5. Jim on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 1:21 pm
  6. Dear Gracious but nevertheless over-reacting Host of Ours:

    This is most probably related to the remote wipe function that is more or less required for the iPhone to compete in the enterprise environment against the Blackberry. Remote wipe is a huge requirement for many an IT department before they’ll sanction the device to work alongside the Blackberry (let alone replace it).

    Don’t worry, though; I’m sure there will be numerous other goodies found soon enough to get your dander up over. ;-)

  7. you on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 1:36 pm
  8. its their good right to make sure you buy it only at their partners! why not!? i dont see any problems with kickin out jailbreaked phones out of the market with brickin it.. be glad ! when your phone gets bricket buy a new one with umts despite the fact umts aka 3g is no even everywhere in us available like in europe and you us dudes are whining around whole time! why the fuck do you need it for?! to surf 4sec faster?!

  9. Hrryank on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 1:43 pm
  10. Yeah, it’s an Enterprise feature. Move along, nothing to see here :)

  11. Zac Bedell on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 3:45 pm
  12. I’m reasonably certain “bricked and sim locked” means that you guessed the NCK unlock code incorrectly too many times. The baseband will no longer accept unlock attempts using the “real” unlock code facility.

    It should still be possible to unlock the baseband through the usual hackish means, and I think the “revirginizer” tools will also set the seczone back to normal to unbrick this particular state back to normal.

  13. Dave-O on Fri, 11th Apr 2008 5:38 pm
  14. Here’s a thought, let Apple write the code and you can keep posting pictures of celebrities with Apple products.

  15. odin on Sat, 12th Apr 2008 5:50 pm
  16. They should add this string: BRICKED_AND_SPONTANEOUS_COMBUSTION_STRING

  17. imajoebob on Sun, 13th Apr 2008 3:11 am
  18. Two obvious explanations:
    1) Apple wants an easy way to unlock bricked phones, so this is where they will write the instruction code.
    2) Have you ever heard the phrase “Red Herring?” Sites like this are likely setting iPhone users’ hair on fire, fearing that any attempt to unlock or hack their phone will render it inert. Apple doesn’t need to actually brick any iPhone; they can sit back while all these hysterical sites create a (false) meme that they will.

Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Contest

Advertisement

Product Reviews

  • IntelliSchool Free is released - Free open source school database system
  • Our Finest Moments

    Where are they now? Interview with Switcher Girl Ellen Feiss

    Review: The iCar by Corgi - Possibly the worst iPod accessory EVER

    Apple blames iPod nano screen defects on obese Americans/tight pants

    Using Safari can slow your system down as much as 76% vs Firefox

    Donate Now

    iPhone Feature Request

  • Categories:

  • Advertisement